Riding on Electrons
The Bose Electronic Suspension, now in prototype testing, is stunning and
simple.
By Frank Markus
Motor Trend, January 2005
If Motor Trend accepted every invitation to look at a new automotive technology
or widget, the editorial staff would have to divide like tapeworms to cover
them all. So we weed out the goofiest and most far-fetched, and, frankly, this
one almost ended up on the No-Thanks pile: "Come to Boston for a day to
see a new Bose technology that's been under development for 24 years."
Bose? Try Stereophile in New York, we thought, until reading "...and it
has nothing to do with sound."
We called to press for details and
were thwarted just provocatively enough to pique our interest. Even upon arrival
at Bose's R&D center in Framingham, the details were slow in coming from
company founder, inventor, academician, and electronics wizard Dr. Amar Bose.
The spry, affable, white-haired Bose, now aged 74, confessed to the crowd of
automotive and technology media a lifelong fascination with automotive suspension
systems. It started in 1957, he explained, when he bought a 1958 Pontiac with
an air suspension and spent 10 years studying, maintaining, and repairing it.
Shortly after letting the Pontiac go, he upped the ante and bought a Citroen
DS to fool around with its even trickier hydropneumatic suspension.
Then, in 1980 he deputized a core group of his research team to develop a math
model depicting the behavior of an ideal automotive suspension, irrespective
of the limitations of mechanical parts. He figured that, if the ideal promised
a quantum improvement over the current state-of-the-suspension art, it would
be worth trying to develop hardware capable of matching the math model. After
five years, the math suggested a need for a far greater range of spring and
damping rates than what was possible then (or now) with conventional steel,
air, and hydraulic systems. So Dr. Bose set his team of research engineers about
the task of leveraging the company's expertise in power amplification, high-speed
switching, and basic electronics--which make Bose audio systems what they are
today--to develop an electromagnetic suspension.
Speaker folks making a suspension? It's not such a leap, really. In a speaker,
a linear electromagnetic motor moves back and forth to vibrate some sort of
membrane that generates sound. Scale up the stroke and the force applied, and
the same basic concept can control the motions of a wheel and tire. With myriad
patents pending, the team was cagey about many details of the system, but here
are the basics: Conventional steel torsion bars bear the weight of the vehicle,
and they adjust to provide load leveling, so no electromagnetic energy is expended
when the car is standing still. Electromagnetic struts replace the shocks or
struts, functioning like giant versions of the electric plunger that strikes
a chime when you press your doorbell button.
They're not to be confused with GM's Magnetic Ride Control (magnetorheological) shocks, which work like normal shocks, except with magnetic particles that can change the viscosity of the shock-absorbing oil. Varying the current to the Bose strut changes its damping over a vastly wider range than is possible with the magnetorheological shocks.
Each Bose electroshock connects
to a wheel damper--a conventional short-stroke hydraulic shock absorber that
packages inside the wheel and carries the knuckle, hub, and brake. This wheel
damper absorbs the very high-frequency (100Hz) vibrations from the wheel, tire,
and brake so the strut only has to control the body motions.
Bose also redesigned the suspension geometry. Because the suspension is programmed
to maintain a nearly level ride attitude at all times, there's no need for the
camber to change much in order to keep the tire contact patch on the road as
it arcs through its range of travel. The upper and lower control arms (front)
and links (rear) aren't the same length, but they're close, which reduces tire
scrub as the suspension strokes over a bump.
We sampled the ride (sort of) in a 1994 Lexus LS 400 fitted with the new system.
It was resting on four electromagnetic rams programmed to pound the tires as
a rough dirt road would if traveling at about 45 mph. The Bose struts were programmed
to mimic the stock LS 400 suspension at first, the effectiveness of which was
demonstrated on an identical stock LS 400 bouncing on a second set of shakers
over the same rough-road program in the next stall. When the engineers flipped
a switch to the Bose suspension control strategy, the car went totally smooth.
Of course, the cynics among us suspected the same computer that was telling
the shaker how to shake the wheel might have been informing the shocks about
what to expect and how to react, so we remained blase.
Then we went outside to watch both the stock and Bose-modified LS 400s negotiate
a tight (30-mph max) lane-change, panic stop, speed bump, and slalom course.
The Bose car's performance on the course was impressive: no body roll, brake
dive, or acceleration squat at all. Of course, the programming could allow some
body roll if desired. Over the speed bump, the body didn't move. It looked as
if it had picked its tires up and put them down again (it doesn't do this, the
system is purely reactive).
For the grand finale, Dr. Bose staged what he called a braking-precision demonstration:
"Watch this 2x6 plank we've placed on edge across the roadway and see how
close we can stop in front of it," he instructed. The Bose car roared toward
the plank at 35 mph, but the driver never lifted. Instead, as the car approached,
it hunkered down, and then leapt over the plank, clearing it like a steeplechase
stallion. This was a parlor trick, with no practical application, but it served
to illustrate the amount of force these shock units can exert. By this point
we had plenty of tough questions for the engineers.
How much power does it consume? The system draws about two horsepower or one-third
the load of a typical air conditioner. While it can exert 50 kilowatts (67 horsepower)
of energy to leap a 2x6, it recovers 49 kilowatts cushioning the landing, with
the shocks working like generators.
What does it weigh? Bose claims
its torsion bars and shock units weigh about what two conventional springs and
shocks plus an (unnecessary) anti-roll bar weigh, but that the wheel damper
adds unsprung mass to each corner. The controllers and upsized alternator also
add some weight, but the total should be less than that of a hydraulic active
suspension.
What's it cost? More than anyone else's suspension does now. The neodymium iron
in the magnets is the most expensive part, and its cost has fallen in half during
the 24 years of development. Expect to see electromagnetic suspensions only
on very expensive cars first, and probably never on cheap ones. What happens
when the power goes out? Unlike your doorbell plunger, these neodymium magnet
plungers move like softly damped shock absorbers if you short the leads to their
electrical windings, which is the fail-safe mode. The torsion bar springs continue
to carry the weight, and the shorted struts behave like luxo-barge shocks.
How durable is it? The electromagnetic plunger floats inside its winding, so
it's virtually non-contact, meaning wear should be way less than with normal
shocks. The wheel dampers presumably would wear like normal shocks. When will
we see it? By mid 2005, a manufacturer will be chosen to codevelop a production
application for sale after three or four years. GM is expected to be the first
development partner, given the long relationship between the companies.
Could this tech be applied elsewhere? Absolutely. We asked whether the same
concept could be used to provide infinitely variable valve timing and lift without
a camshaft, and were stonewalled, so that's almost certainly under development.
Driving simulators, vehicle shakers, amusement park rides, etc. are all possibilities.
The road from the computer model through full 100,000-mile harsh-environment
durability testing is a mighty difficult one, and many great ideas never complete
the trip. We sincerely hope this one does.